"The Ethics of Care" is an excellent example of a paper on medical ethics. The ethical dilemma in this case for whether the five people on the roof to go back and help those people who are trapped inside or just remain there and wait for rescue because they are also in danger. My value is that people should save a life if they can. Here, my ethical position is for the people on the roof to organize themselves and help those trapped inside if they can. However, those willing to help should respect the decision of those who do not want to because of the current situation.
This position bases on the principles of autonomy and beneficence in the sense that respect for personal decision in this scenario reflects autonomy while taking positive action to help those trapped reflects the principle of beneficence (Beauchamp & Childress, 2009). The alternative for resolving the problem is for people to make personal decisions here. Those willing to go back should and those who do not want should stay put because time is limited and the rescue should be done.
The consequence of the alternative action is that the people that are trapped are likely to be rescued. However, those going to risk them risk being trapped along with the others. I would prioritize the safety of those already on the roof because they can be easily rescued then goes for those trapped. This will be the second priority because it is not safe. My plan of action is to rescue those already available than those that are trapped. The reasoning here is that it is a risky process going back and endangers the lives of those going back. Health care providers have an obligation to provide for those entrusted in their care.
They do meet this obligation in a variety of ways, for instance through running tests on them, giving them medication, giving them food and health feedback, and ensuring that their families are included in the care process. However, this obligation could conflict with their personal obligation for instance when their own lives are in danger and are supposed to take care of themselves. This could also conflict with their own obligations when those they are caring for threaten their well-being (Nortvedt, Hem & Skirbekk, 2011). The place that I can go for resources to help a patient deal with grief is support groups.
I would choose this source because it provides care, love, and support for the patient. Care love and support are important for a grieving person and as such make the above place worthwhile. It would be best to refer patients to other resources because they can provide different ways or perspectives of dealing with grief not provided by the first resource.
I would help them identify the possible resources by helping them search for them and care to know how they progress (Bruce, 2002). To deal with my own grief, the place I would go for resources to help me would be a support group. I would choose this source because I will get other people with such kinds of problems as my own and this will help me get to know that I am not alone and that there are people who go through the same and overcome the situation they are facing.
In times of grief, people need understanding, encouragement, support, and care. All these can be found in support groups thereby making it an effective source. I will get as much help here because the encouragement that comes from such a source is overwhelming and important in times of grief (Bruce, 2007).
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed., pp. 38-39). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bruce, C. A. (2002). The grief process for patient, family, and physician. JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 102(9 suppl), 28S-28S.
Bruce, C. A. (2007). Helping patients, families, caregivers, and physicians, in the grieving process. JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 107(suppl 7), ES33-ES40.
Nortvedt, P., Hem, M. H., & Skirbekk, H. (2011). The ethics of care: Role obligations and moderate partiality in health care. Nursing Ethics, 18(2), 192-200.