"Provision of Efficient Care in a Health Care Facility" is a decent example of a paper on the health system. The provision of efficient care in a health care facility is dependent on competent management. The manager should have some analytical skills. It allows the manager to collect information on new trends, technology, and the staff/patients' needs to facilitate the decision-making process. The ability to delegate duties or co-manage responsibilities is a vital skill as it makes room for better decision-making by spreading the risk (The George Washington University, 2020).
It also allows the manager to focus on more important issues while showing subordinates that they are trusted which makes them loyal improving quality. The management should also possess technical skills. The George Washington University (2020) states that hospitals today use technology for daily operations. For instance, when a manager needs to access the electronic health records of a patient to review a case, it will be detrimental to their image if they are unable to accomplish this task. A good manager is flexible and can adapt to the organization. Most managers go into an organization with specific goals in mind, and this may be challenging when the adaptation process goes wrong.
The healthcare manager should instead learn more about the staff and adjust the plans to the individual need and organizational culture for improved quality. A good manager is effective in communications and attentive in interactions. One manager in a neighboring facility is known for taking their time to interact with staff in and out of work. This practice has made her relatable to the employees as she assigns responsibilities according to their different capabilities.
it also makes it easier for information to flow and allows for faster and informed decision making In a health care setting, teamwork is vital. All medical practitioners, the hospital staff, and technicians collaborate to ensure that the quality of care to patients is exemplary. The quality improvement team has the responsibility of identifying problems within the system and coming up with plans that facilitate improvement efforts (AHRQ, 2013). They take part in gathering ad analyzing information through benchmarking and acquiring feedback from all involved parties. The chief executive officer of the organization, the medical directors, physicians, nurses, patients, community health workers, and the finance officers are some members that may be included in the quality improvement team (AHRQ, 2013).
They are each potential team members because the proposed plans of action have a direct impact on their work or in the case of patients their recovery. Additionally, their insight is essential for instance, to make an improvement plan, the issue has to be identified first, and patients and medical staff are the best persons for the identification. Collaborative decision-making is the core of a significant number of successful organizations.
Contrary to the popular opinion where the method is known to be time-consuming the appointment of a facilitator ensures the group's focus does not waiver leading to high velocity and quality decision making (Inamdar, 2018). Establishing each member’ s goals and leveraging the different expertise helps to ensure that each individual gets some satisfaction. According to Inamdar (2018), the team works best by focusing on finding solutions to the problem rather than the problem itself as there is the risk of falling out. In organizations that use the team approach to improve quality through efficient and effective decision-making, the expected results are satisfactory to all involved personnel.
The decisions involve compromising for the greater good. Another desired outcome is the high motivation among staff for better services. While a multidisciplinary team also helps to improve care, it is not as efficient when compared to a quality team whose purpose is to engage all in increasing efficiency. Such a team is useful as it improves employee morale in a way that does not display reproach; it also facilitates trust within the different relationships in the group. One disadvantage of group decision-making is that there are varying ideas and opinions.
It may be a massive obstacle in the process as more time may be required to evaluate all alternatives. The decisions made by the group can be biased. For instance, it may favor the management rather than the staff to avoid the risk of retrenchments.